National Shows
Show Information:
Weather Now:
Interactive » Blogs
Your Story

Wed, April 3, 2013

Tattoos NOT for dogs

I've got a story coming up on the PhilCast today about a guy in North Carolina taking some heat for getting his dog a tattoo.

I don't think a dog should have to be put through this for the pleasure of an owner who thinks it's cool.

Oh this guy is trying to say he did it for I-D purposes. Ya, right. That's what a micro-chip is for.

And I was somewhat surprised to read that even PETA is OK with doing this.

If a dog owner doesn't go micro-chip for an I-D then perhaps a small tattoo marking would be okay with me, although it is not something I would ever do to any dog I own.

Going to the extent that this guy did here is just wrong in my opinion. You like tattoos then keep 'em on your own body and leave the ink off your dog.


LATEST BLOGS
The Thursday PhilCast features both baseball and B.A.B.E.S., something I thought would be funny to Google image and see what…
posted by Philcast 12 hours ago
Where was Ted Cruz during March Madness, when all those college kids were throwin' down the rock from three-point range…
posted by Philcast 1 day ago
Science can be a wonderful thing...when applied to things useful in life. This, is not the case. I learned today…
posted by Philcast 2 days ago