Milwaukee Brewers
Weather Now:
On-Air » Blogs
Your Story

Wed, April 3, 2013

Tattoos NOT for dogs

I've got a story coming up on the PhilCast today about a guy in North Carolina taking some heat for getting his dog a tattoo.

I don't think a dog should have to be put through this for the pleasure of an owner who thinks it's cool.

Oh this guy is trying to say he did it for I-D purposes. Ya, right. That's what a micro-chip is for.

And I was somewhat surprised to read that even PETA is OK with doing this.

If a dog owner doesn't go micro-chip for an I-D then perhaps a small tattoo marking would be okay with me, although it is not something I would ever do to any dog I own.

Going to the extent that this guy did here is just wrong in my opinion. You like tattoos then keep 'em on your own body and leave the ink off your dog.


LATEST BLOGS
John Ross, Guest on the Good Neighbor Show, Tuesday, May 24, 2016 Topic:  LaCie Rugged RAID portable hard drive My…
posted by The Good Neighbor 3 hours ago
CLICK HERE for a good starting grid spotter guide to see the drivers and their cars. Here is the listener/driver…
posted by Philcast 11 hours ago
Remember the bright yellow rubber wristbands that Lance Armstrong came up with called "Livestrong" that were all the rage before…
posted by Philcast 1 day ago