National Shows
Show Information:
Weather Now:
On-Air » Blogs
Your Story

Wed, April 3, 2013

Tattoos NOT for dogs

I've got a story coming up on the PhilCast today about a guy in North Carolina taking some heat for getting his dog a tattoo.

I don't think a dog should have to be put through this for the pleasure of an owner who thinks it's cool.

Oh this guy is trying to say he did it for I-D purposes. Ya, right. That's what a micro-chip is for.

And I was somewhat surprised to read that even PETA is OK with doing this.

If a dog owner doesn't go micro-chip for an I-D then perhaps a small tattoo marking would be okay with me, although it is not something I would ever do to any dog I own.

Going to the extent that this guy did here is just wrong in my opinion. You like tattoos then keep 'em on your own body and leave the ink off your dog.

Houston over Indy Kansas City over Chicago Cincinnati over Seattle Atlanta over Washington Tampa Bay over Jacksonville Philadelphia over New…
posted by Justin Hull 1 day ago
One of the stories I'll discuss on the Thursday PhilCast is about an 800-pound man who was kicked out of…
posted by Philcast 1 day ago
Remember when TV theme songs were a big deal? I do. Interesting story I saw today from Billboard, the people…
posted by Philcast 2 days ago