Following this week’s highly-anticipated testimony from former Special Counsel Robert Mueller, most of the coverage centered on the question of obstruction of justice, a topic Mueller was visibly uncomfortable discussing. Unfortunately that testimony came before the session focused on foreign interference in our elections, in which Mueller was far more talkative and forthcoming. How did this fact shape the coverage of Mueller’s testimony? Josh explains why a lack of surprises resulted in some dangerously banal political analysis ignoring the most important questions of the moment.
Bob and Weave
Jul 26, 2019 | 2:02 PM



